Governor Gavin Newsom of the Great State of California has just decided his ‘peeps’ don’t need no stinkin’ Trump on their ballots. He has just signed a Bill which is aimed at keeping President Trump off the ballots in California in the next national elections. I have no idea, as I presume he has no idea, of just how much chance he has of being able to enforce this law to supersede the Feds in a national election.
This is a vivid example of what political cranks can do to muck up the world. This Bill bars any candidate from their statewide ballots if they refuse to publicly release the most recent five years of their tax filings according to Freedom News. It targets primary election races instead of general election races.
By keeping this as a “state” issue, the obvious hope is that the Feds will not be able to step in, and Trump, presumably refusing to comply with the state requirement, would be excluded from the California ballot since he didn’t participate in the state’s primary election.
There are a lot of votes to be had in California, and there could be a situation where the absence of that number would be sufficient to swing a national race. There has always been, from previous indications, a real effort by California officials to keep the Feds from even exploring their state’s systems of vote tabulation, etc.
This reputation for California would seem to have already brought a very extensive review administered by the Feds, but there apparently must be something keeping that from occurring. That “something” might prove an interesting subject to be explored.
California has enjoyed being a significant source of influence in national races historically, but Trump has overseen tax code changes that have caused “a mass exodus of billionaires” and state tax revenues have suffered. There is a reputation for illegals being given the vote by this state assuming the votes would be “properly” cast.
With President Trump sealing our borders, the influx of new illegals to cast votes in California will be diminished. And that apparently could affect national races. Sealing the border would put a stop to the growth of the number of illegal votes, and, over the long haul, that could change the voting complexion of a very large state.
All this also affects the money California has to play with, and they have been getting into deeper “do-do” annually and can ill-afford to see a revenue stream closed or severely reduced.
It is “stuff” like this that makes one wonder; another reason to re-elect President Trump may have just been given us Americans.
Go to the:
http://www.TheCurmudgeonWrites.blogspot.com for the blog.
I have studied the possibility of making some changes in this blog to improve the overall appearance, the numbers of hits it receives from readers, and the potential for a more robust site.
The new name is planned to be The Curmudgeon Writes and I will move the blog to the Google Blogger site which is a very robust, great looking site for bloggers. It was amazing to see the number of bloggers, active or retired but still holding naming rights, who have used “Curmudgeon” as part of their blog title. The bulk of those are no longer active but those naming rights are still held should those people return to blogging.
As soon as that is finalized later today, I will communicate the final name (in case someone beat me to this name) and how to log on to the new blog site. I hope, and think, you will be pleased with the change you see. The tools available are robust and I will have to learn how best to employ them as quickly as possible. The appearance is significantly improved over the platform I’ve been using.
This blog has become an essential part of me over the time it has been alive. I appreciate all the readers who have followed it and I hope there will be more and more as the new site is populated six days a week with a blog. I have had no way of determining the actual number of readers the blog has attracted in the past and will have that ability in this new world. I may be pleasantly surprised or saddened, but that is the chance that has to be taken.
The new address for the blog is intended to be:
As soon as that is confirmed later today, I will communicate it on this site…likely the last use of this old site. Thanks to each of you for reading this version. I hope you’ll make the move to the new version along with me.
How would you handle getting up each morning knowing that you were already being damned for something you did as well as for something you didn’t? Our President is polarizing and he has no end of critics…who both criticize for what he has done as well as for what he has not done. That is more a lose-lose than a win-win proposition, but he chose it.
I try to remember when we had a President that we didn’t pillory no matter what was done or left undone. Maybe that goes back as far as Dwight D. Eisenhower, the former General whom we placed in the White House. Maybe it goes back to Harry S. Truman, the Missouri clothier.
As I worked through the list it became apparent that we had far less access on a daily or even an hourly basis to the doings of our government in earlier times, not times before modern communication but times before the polarization we seem to crave these days. There were times, and I know it is hard to believe for many, when we did not live in a 24 hour per day news cycle.
We might have gotten the morning or afternoon newspaper or even both if we were real news junkies. And there were, although I’m not sure we knew what to call them at that point in our history, sources that leaned to the left and sources that leaned to the right. The leanings didn’t seem to be quite so pronounced or quite so drastic as they seem today, but there were political overtones.
We have created what we live with today, and we did so in an anxious, can’t wait kind of way. We have come to the point where getting the news an hour after it happens seems like a breakdown in technology. Imagine how our forefathers made it through the days and weeks-long delays for news from the World War II front. And the Korean front.
And further, imagine only tube-driven radios with no pictures and static for sound that we huddled around to hear the latest, even though it wouldn’t qualify as the ‘latest’ today. The thing that has changed is simple: we get too much information today and we get it too soon and we don’t always analyze the content for leanings to the left or to the right. Or, we have analyzed and chosen the left or right intentionally, thus causing us to get what we want but not everything we need to reach fully informed middle-of-the-road opinions.
There is no more middle-of-the-road for news so that we can digest it and interpret it as we choose. It has already been digested and interpreted when we receive it. That explains why it is so important for us to know what the slant is to the news from the source we’re using for that news.
People are heard to talk about the ‘good old days’ when they reminisce with friends or when they talk with younger family members. Those days were slower although an hour was still an hour even then. Our days are filled with so much it seems we must have more than 60 minute hours and more than 24 hour days. We are if we permit ourselves to be, inundated with news. Many of us are addicted to more news more rapidly.
Back to the beginning…
We are quick to damn and quick to praise our leaders depending upon our personal political persuasion. The 24-hour news cycle is a vicious thing for those who are leading us. There is no respite. There is simply no time to take that step back and re-think before we engage mouth or pen.
Our leaders suffer from that and are too often damned if they did or damned if they didn’t. We suffer from that, too. We are instant recipients of news, and that does not give us the former luxury of others having noodled and shared their thoughts with us.
We’ve lost a bit as we’ve progressed, and our youngsters will only read about this in history classes if that is even taught. Makes one wonder what we’re leaving to our children and their children and their children.
More, more quickly, is not always better.
Given that I am of a generation that has witnessed amazing new technological leaps, the idea that I’d walk into a Barnes & Noble store to pick up a book I had ordered from them probably dates me more than anything else I could say or do. Yes, I have heard of Amazon, however, I am not yet tied to that entity for any and all things I seek…but that is going to change whether or not I like the idea.
I did walk into the local Barnes & Noble last Friday to pick up a copy of a book I wanted (Google’s Blogger for Dummies, but please don’t tell anyone). I had ordered it through B&N when I walked into their store and found they didn’t carry it on their bookshelves. No, I didn’t think about Amazon, but I wish I had given the price difference and the fact that I’d have had my book sooner.
I am not a ‘Nook” person since I love the tactile sensation of the book or the newspaper, but I think I see a change coming…whether or not I might be in favor of that change.
My Barnes & Noble experience was one of some frustration since they seemed only to have employees in places where I wasn’t. I was e-mailed to let me know my book was ready for pick-up a few days after my visit, and I went back right away only to find that where I placed the order wasn’t where I was to pick up the order.
That was only made known to me after I sought human assistance only to find the two people who seemed to be employees engaged in conversation and seeming to not wish to be interrupted…who finally acknowledged me only to dismissively say that I couldn’t pick up the book I ordered from the department where I had ordered it, but from the cashier where I’d be paying for the book.
There, I’ve vented. But that doesn’t change reality. Bookstores are dwindling in numbers. Barnes & Noble is suffering significantly. It had a 5.3% decrease in store revenue and, even worse, a 19.5% decrease in their Nook revenue. Libraries are even competing effectively with Barnes & Noble through the use of Overdrive that delivers Nook books at no cost to the reader.
Barnes & Noble competes with itself with the free Nook books it makes available.
I should’ve been able to see this wall writing the day I stopped at Barnes & Noble when I saw the paucity of customers. I may be among the last of a breed in terms of my preference for books I can hold, but I will not soon forget that Amazon has anything and everything I could imagine, and I can have it a discounted prices and delivered to my door pronto.
(By the way, I think I will likely be moving my Curmudgeon Blog to a different system that seems to be more accommodating. You probably got that hint when I mentioned the book ‘Google’s Blogger for Dummies’. I’ll keep you posted; ideally, the change won’t be too painful for either you or me.)
Unfettered power is also defined as unrestrained power, and this was what a wise Judge questioned providing to the very special Special Prosecutor, Robert Mueller, who is on the hunt to bring down our President.
That is the end game for Mueller…to bring down President Donald Trump, our duly elected President of the United States of America. Mueller currently has Paul Manafort in his grip and is trying to get a Judge to authorize him to do anything he desires to threaten Manafort in order to be able to make him testify against President Trump.
So far the Judge has refused to give in to Mueller and has told him he, the Judge, knows that Mueller is trying to topple the President with his hopes of destroying Manafort to force him to testify against the President.
Can you even begin to imagine the outcry from the left if these tactics had been in use by a Special Prosecutor whose aim was directed at the destruction of then-President Barack Obama? Of course not. That would’ve been unthinkable…even for Conservatives…since Obama was a duly-elected President of the United States of America.
I know that liberals will say that if he had done what Trump is alleged to have done, they would’ve supported that action. We all know, even the liberals know, that is B.S.
As conservatives, we have become accustomed to being scoffed at, to being ridiculed, to being relegated to the scrap heap of history only to rise up periodically to point out the folly of liberals. The liberals conveniently forget President Reagan, as well as conveniently forgetting the in-office follies of then-President Barack Obama. We need not go back so far as President Clinton.
They cheer Obama’s behind-the-scenes out-of-office efforts that have launched an organization the power of which will dwarf anything dreamed up to date by former political chieftains. The ‘grassroots lobbying’ machine that has been constructed by the Obamas is a frightening look at the seizure of power through the use of modern communications media that uses the general populace as the warriors for the movement.
Our attention is diverted through the antics of the liberals still in power who know full well what they’re doing is buying the Obama Machine time to grow their grassroots machine into a political steamroller. The Muellers of the political world serve Obama well in that these diversionary tactics draw what scant attention the press would usually pay to Democrat shenanigans away from the Obama family and its well-formed machine that had to have been conceived well before he left office.
The Muellers of D.C. world serve well in keeping the attention on what they seem to perceive as the evil empire of Donald Trump. Every once in awhile we see a Judge who hasn’t sold out to the liberals stand up to the likes of Robert Mueller who has apparently taken his appointment as the bequeathing of power to destroy the sitting President…no matter what that might take.
This is not what we want to leave for our children and their children, but this is what is being built steadily, day-in and day-out, as the liberals do their level-best to take down President Trump no matter what. Robert Mueller is the latest tool, the latest weapon in the liberal arsenal, and he is well-suited to the job he was assigned.
Unfettered power is the Devil’s tool, and he will find those who believe in the use of such unfettered power at his beck and call. Washington, D.C. is awash with such people. We see them on news broadcasts daily. We see them on the daily talk shows. We read their screeds in liberal publications.
Unfettered power in anyone’s hands is dangerous for we all are human and we have human weaknesses. We see that on display daily from the heart of our democracy and some of us weep silently and work against it while others seem to take great joy in what they’ve wrought.